Underruff

This hand was played by Subrata Saha in a local one day duplicate tournament held yesterday.

N
North
J102
109456
KQJ92
9
S
South
A8345
10924
AK3
7

 

W
West
N
North
E
East
S
South
1
1
2NT(1)
3♣(2)
3
3
Pass
4
Pass
Pass
Dbl
All Pass
 
 

(1) 4+, limit raise or better 

(2) some  and  .

Most likely North took that 3  bid as encouraging and bid 4 . Subrata da ruffed the lead and played  K from dummy, east produced a high   (playing udca) and E took his A. After a significant thought he failed to play a trump and returned a  . Declarer ruffed 2 s in dummy and discarded 2 red loser on  QJ to reach the following ending:

N
North
109x
9x
 
S
South
A8xxx

 

 

 

 He played 4th   from dummy (I do not find any difference between   and ) and when his RHO ruffed with 9, he smartly under ruffed that. The helpless RHO did not have any legitimate way to beat the contract, declarer ruffed his  return and claimed the contract after playing  A and back . Had he over ruffed the  9, defense would be able to defeat the contract by taking 3 and a trick.

 

 

 

 
You have probably already realized that the defending side could have done better by returning a . Can you figure out if declarer had a better line?

 

 

0

Pages:

Leave a Reply