HCL Pairs Finals – a sorry tale of lost opportunities, poor decisions and more.. – morning session

Quite in contrast to the previous hand, the next poor result was a totally self committed harakiri.

Here’s the hand and auction

 
1
N-S
West
N
North
10762
AK10
Q4
AQ63
 
W
West
43
J87543
AK
J108
A
E
East
A985
Q6
J9853
K7
 
S
South
KQJ
92
10762
9542
 

 

W
West
N
North
E
East
S
South
21
Pass
32
Pass
Pass
Dbl
Pass
3
All Pass
 
 
 
(1) Multi
(2) Pass/Correct

 That double of 3 by partner was against our agreement. We tend to play pure doubles, with shortage. Three honours in the suit, and only a doubleton   are a no-no. However, there it was. I chose to hedge with 3 rather than gamble into a precarious 4 minor

The defense started with  A and shifted to  J. Placing the king on my right, I went up Ace and played a spade. East won the ace, cashed  K and crossed to  K to collect his  ruff. He now played a small  ruffed by West and overruffed in dummy. It was certainly obvious that 3 was not making for them, and I had already lost 5 tricks . However, -100 might be worth a couple of matchpoints, -200 was certainly a zero. I’d be -1 if  were 3-3 initially, but when East proved to have 4 of them, I tried the finesse of  T in desperation. No luck – 200 away and a clear zero.

2+

2 thoughts on “HCL Pairs Finals – a sorry tale of lost opportunities, poor decisions and more.. – morning session

  • September 19, 2017 at 1:11 PM
    Permalink

    On the last board (Board 1) why didn’t North double the multi 2D? I suppose you play the double as values, with generally 3-3 + in the majors.

    He can safely stay out of the auction after that, having announced his values.

    I suspect his double of 3H was for penalties.

    0
  • September 19, 2017 at 1:36 PM
    Permalink

    He missed doubling 2d, which is what he should be doing. Now when he heard 3H he got worried about losing a partial. It wasn’t for penalty..

    0

Leave a Reply